|
Links
to the Past: Course Sites for Dr. Christopher Lovett
|
|
updated as of 9 Feb 03
Back to Iraq: The Search for Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction Bush's New National Security Strategy of the United States Contemporary Terrorist Organizations Eisenhower
Library Research Topics Map of Islamic Terrorist Cells in the U.S.A.
|
Europe Moves into the Middle EastModern Middle EastFall 2002General Observations By the 18th Century the Europeans had surpassed the Middle East. Now the Europeans held the upper hand. But the peoples in the Muslim world wanted for this to happen. However, what could the Islamic world do to reverse European power? Earlier, the Middle East commanded the Eastern trade routes. But now that had changed. Now Europeans lived in specified quarters in the Muslim world, often free of paying taxes.Declining Military Formations. Once the Ottomans could make war where and when they choose. Now the world had passed them by. The Ottomans could no longer make war with the West when they wanted to. No matter what the Sultans agents attempted they could not reverse their declining fortunes.Clear Signs of Decline The first major example was the inability to take Vienna in 1683. The Treaty of Karlowitz only reinforced those feelings when the Ottoman had to acknowledged the loss of Hungary. Likewise the Sultan had to cede the Aegean coasts to the Venetians. In 1774, the Turks lost the Crimea to the Russians and allowed the Russians to defend the interests of their co-religionists in the Ottoman Empire.Here Comes Napoleon The greatest shock came when Napoleon invaded Egypt in 1798. The Turks could not effectively respond. But that was not the only problem. Napoleon then moved into Palestine. The Ottomans were in trouble.Interesting Theories One theory involved the lack of interest on the part of the sultans because ofOther Interpretations Bureaucrats bought and sold their offices. Officials gouged themselves on taxes stiff armed from the peasants. The janissaries who should have been the backbone of the state now became a hereditary caste. The janissaries had become a class of merchants who no longer trained and did not keep up with modern weaponry. When the janissaries did not get their way, they often revolted.The Breakdown of Law and Order The Ulama turned into a bunch of ignoramuses. The public was steeped in superstition. Landowners and merchants were robbed by brigands. There was little or no protection from criminals in the countryside. Likewise the peasants were exploited by the landlords. Who to blame? The Turks often said the fish stinks from the head.Sultan Problems Sultan Ibrahim (1640-48) was insane and had his 280 concubines tied in sacks and drowned in the Bosporus. Sultan Mustafa II (1695-1703) was mistaken to take the field against Prince Eugene. As a result he lost much of Hungary and his army. Drinking and harem intrigues only further weakened the sultanate. Some sultans attempted to correct those problems, but challenged existing authority.The Reforming Sultans Osman II (1618-22) attempted to reform the military by forming a new militia organization, which threatened the Janissaries. Instead the Janissaries killed him. Murad IV (1623-40) killed nearly 25,000 rebels. Mahmud I (1730-54) was the first to bring Europeans to train Turks on the new military system in Europe. Additional reforms were introduced by Selim II (1789-1807).The Koprulu Family The Koprulu family produced six grand vizirs. The first, Mehmet (d. 1661), was taken from his Christian family in Albania during the devshirme. He had begun his career working in the Imperial Kitchen. He worked for Mehmet IV (1648-87) and helped crush revolts in Transylvania and Anatolia. His son, Ahmet checked the Habsburgs and seized Crete. His brother led the siege of Vienna in 1683. A nephew lowered taxes and set up factories for Mustafa II.Assessing the Reforming Impulse Dama Ibrahim, another vizir, best known for diverting Sultan Ahmed III (1703-1730) into building palaces and tulip gardens. Sultan Ahmed brought in European artists and commissioned Turkish translation of Western scientific studies. He also introduced the first printing press. Overall, even during the low point of Ottoman history, Sultans attempted to modernize. This trend would continued into the nineteenth century.Traditional Ottoman Foes Before 1750 the traditional enemies of the Ottomans included: Vienna Spain PolandThe Correlation of Forces Against The Turks Austria had become the prime defender of Christendom. But a new power emerges on the scene that was a far greater threat than previously thought. This was Russia.The Goals of the Tsars Unlike other European powers, the Russians had experience Muslim rule under the Mongol Golden Horde. Russia emerged around the city of Moscow in the fifteenth century. By controlling the river networks, Moscow continued to expand, looking for a warm water outlet. One target for the Russians was the Black Sea coast. This was the dream of Peter the Great.The Need for the Straits The Russians controlled much of the Black Sea. To such an extent that the Black Sea was a Russian Lake. The Russians realized that the Turks could close the straits anytime. Likewise, Russian control of the straits would protect Russian ports on the Black Sea.Other Russian Goals To restore the Byzantine Empire. Since Moscow was the Third Rome. With the fall of Constantinople, Russia became the protector of all of the Ottoman subjects in the Ottoman Empire. The Russian Tsars wanted to control Tsargrad and restore the power and glory of the Byzantine state. The Russians saw themselves better able to protect the peoples of the Balkans than the Austrians.Russian Links to the Sultans Balkan Subjects Besides religion. There was another link. That link was Pan Slavism. The goal of linking all Slavic peoples. This lead to an aggressive Middle Eastern policy.Russias Aggressive Intentions in the Nineteenth Century Russian Troops entered the Balkans in 1806-12. Greek War of Independence in the 1820s. The Rumanian Uprising in 1848. The Crimean War (1854-56) The Russo-Turkish War (1877-78). Help create the climate for the Balkan Wars (1912-13).The Heart of the Eastern Question The central issue was whether Russian would grab the Ottoman Empire for themselves. The only way they could be stopped is by an alliance of the other European powers. The Russian goals and aspirations went against the foreign policy objectives of the many of the other European nations. Could the Balance of Power save the Ottomans? Or would war change that?The Habsburgs Ambitions The Habsburg Lands border the Ottoman Empire in Southeastern Europe. The Habsburgs wanted to follow the course of the Danube to the Black Sea. Plus the Habsburgs wanted to gain control of Croatia, Bosnia, and Serbia. The Habsburgs masked commercial interests in a crusade against the Turks. As a result of the Treaty of Berlin (1878) Austria gained Bosnia-Herzegovina. The Turks were slowly being driven out.The British and the Middle East The British were concerned with maintaining of their links to India. The Ottoman Empire was no concern to them before the Suez Canal and advent of the steamship. The British were concerned with the French moving into the Fertile Crescent. By 1830, London decided that the Ottomans were necessary to guard the land routes to India. By 1850, the Turks had become one of Britains key purchasers of British goods.Britain: Ottoman Protector The British were involved in the largest European conflict since the Napoleon Wars in order to protect the Ottoman Empire. This was the Crimean War.The Crimean War One theory for the war was the struggle over the keys to the Holy sites in Jerusalem between Orthodox and Catholic priests. In reality , the war was involved the fear of the Russians. The British moved to the aid of the Turks, not only here, but also in 1878. But this was done at a price.British Gains in the Middle East To protect shipping routes to India. Britain gained:The French: Protecting their Interests Traditionally the French were the allies of the Ottomans. They were the enemies of the Habsburgs. France held the first Capitulatory Treaty with the Ottomans. The French also were the largest investors in the Ottoman Empire too. Turks often went to France to be educated. France protected Catholic interests in the region.French Links With Syria The link to the French in Syria were the Maronites. The Maronites were found in Northern Lebanon. The Maronites took a middle position between the Orthodox and the Catholics. They managed to keep their married priests and their Syriac language. But they acknowledged the primacy of Rome.Egypt or Syria Egypt was in serious situation. Due to Ottoman neglect. The Mamluks misruled Egypt too. Even after Napoleon left and Egypt was on its own, French advisers helped Mehmet Ali. Mehmet Ali took Syria from the Ottomans in 1831. France was the only power to help Mehmet Ali. The British ultimately forced Mehmet Ali to withdraw from Syria. But he and his heirs ruled Egypt until 1952.The Suez Canal Mehmets son, Said granted a concession to build a canal linking the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. The British sought to block it. Why? Because it could challenge the British lines of communication with India. Once the canal opened in 1869, the British became the prime user. Soon the British gained the Egypt governments shares of the Canal Company.The British Solidify Their Position Soon the British move troops in to control the Canal and quell civil unrest in 1882. The British then, in time, gain control of not only the Canal, but also the whole Nile. The French on the other hand, moved into Algeria earlier in the nineteenth century. By the start of the twentieth century, the French sought control of Morocco. Following World War I, the French gained a foothold in Syria.
|