|
Links
to the Past: Course Sites for Dr. Christopher Lovett
|
|
updated as of 9 Feb 03
Back to Iraq: The Search for Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction Bush's New National Security Strategy of the United States Contemporary Terrorist Organizations Eisenhower
Library Research Topics Map of Islamic Terrorist Cells in the U.S.A.
|
The Lords of the Horizon: The Rise of the OttomansModern Middle EastFall 2002Modernization and The State Traditional historians tend to champion drums and trumpets. In other words, history and historians tend to emphasize political history. As a result they overlook the social forces that alter and change history. One area that breaks that mold is the ground breaking work of Carlo Cipolla.The Military Revolution Cipolla studied military technology. Gunpowder and the advent of firearms was as momentous as the use of atomic weapons. Gunpowder was first used by the Chinese since the tenth century. The Mongols used the weapons and spread the new technology. By 1330 both Christian and Muslim armies were used cannons against each other in Spain.The First Weapons But the cannons were either too big or too clumsy. The were not perfect and were only fit to unnerve horses. As a result they could halt or impede an enemy charge. By the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, Italian and German gunsmiths were making modifications on cannon to make them more lethal. Bronze gave way to Iron and the weapons were standardized. Improving loading and firing.Weapons Development and Change Changes in weapon design contributed to changes in Mining Metallurgy Design Assembly And road building.The Changes in the Military Order The new weapons required further changes in military organization. Better recruits. Better training. Establish academies to train those in the artillery and engineers. The same applied for the navy. Here, like other forms of modernization, the Ottomans failed the test.The Home of the Turks The home of the Ottomans was near Sogut in central Anatolia. In the 13th Century the area was part of the Rum Seljuk Turkish Sultanate. Legends have it that the Ertogrul helped the Rum Seljuks combat the Byzantines. As a result, bestowed an Iqta, or land grant, on Ertogrul around Sogut. This was based on to his son Osman.Osman After the death of Ertogrul, sometime between 1280-99, leadership based to Osman. Osman worked closely with a Sufi leader with special arms. He carried a special sword and was commanded to wage a relentless Jihad against the Byzantines. Osman then took the title ghazi or Holy Warrior. From this time forward, until the end of the Ottoman rule in 1923, descendants of Osman ruled the Ottoman state.History vs. Legend We dont know if Ertogrul really lived. Current scholarship tend to support a case that Osmans ancestors had lived in Anatolia since about 1071. This was when the Seljuks administered a crushing defeat on the Byzantines. What is important? Truth or what people believe to be true? The Ottomans believed that the Ottomans opposed not only the Byzantines, but also the Mongols. What did those groups have in common? Both were non-Muslim.The Weakness of the Byzantine Empire The Byzantine Empire experienced a blow that the Empire never recovered. The Fourth Crusade in 1204, when the West occupied Constantinople, and subsequently established a Latin Kingdom in its place. The Byzantines managed to regain Constantinople in 1262. But by then the Empire was grievously weakened. However, it appeared that the Byzantines were spared since the mortal enemy of the Byzantines, the Seljuks were in trouble too. Especially following the Mongol victory over the Seljuks in 1243.The State of the Seljuks The Seljuks no longer had control over the Turkish warriors in the region. The area of northern and western Anatolia were called Marches. Which were border regions contested between warring factions. The settled population in those zones were Greek and Orthodox. The mountain people were Muslim either Sunni or Shiite. But almost always Sufi. Raids were their favorite activity.Osmans Iqta Osmans lands were small, but they overlooked Byzantine territory. Osman I (ca 1260-1326) conducted raids exploiting the holdings of the Byzantines. Other Turkish political leaders may have made peace with the Ottomans. Osman never did. For nine years, Osman besieged Bursa, and was captured shortly before Osman died. It became the first Ottoman capital.Introduction Slowly the Turks moved in the direction of the Dardanelles and toward Ankara. Twice the Ottomans were invited by the Byzantines to come to the aid of the Byzantine Emperor. Who was threatened by internal rivals and foreign enemies. The rule of Orhan (1326-1360) was the start of the fall. He even had mints mint his likeness on coins. On the third time Orhan crossed the Dardenelles, his troops took Gallipoli and refused to leave.Conquests of Murad I (1360-89) He was the son of Orhan and continued his fathers Ottoman policies. Murad I continued the Ottoman advance:Expansion in the Balkans Soon the Byzantines were surrounded in Constantinople. Now the key Christian power was Serbia, under King Lazar. Leading an alliance of Bulgars, Serbs, Macedonians, and Albanians he sought to check the Turks. Legend has it that this number totaled 100,000 men. Murad I had ca. 60,000 troops. Murad won the day at Kosvo Filed in 1389. Both Murad I and Lazar died that day. Yet Serbia lost her independence.Advance on Constantinople Under Bayezid (1389-1402), the Ottomans began to lay siege to Constantinople in 1395. Western knights, including Hungarians, English, French, and German warriors came to the Emperors aid. Bayezid defeated them at Nicopolis in 1396. Soon the capital of the Ottomans moved from Bursa in Anatolia to Edirne in Thrace. The Ottomans waited for the fall of Constantinople which never came.Bayezids Failure Was not satisfied in expanding into Europe and taking Constantinople. Instead he ventured Eastern World and drew the attention of Tamerlane and was captured and died in captivity. His heirs than set out to divided his state. After an eleven year interregnum, Mehmet I (1413-1421) restored order and suppressed a series of enemy revolts and foreign challenges. Murad II managed to continue the Ottoman advance.Problems for Murad II (1421-1451) Faced Challenged from John Hunyadi of Transylvania and Skanderberg of Albania. Faced a Christian advance to the Black Sea port of Varna. And was kept from retiring because of those threats. He actually came out of retirement to protect Ottoman holdings.The Resumption of the Reign of Mehmet II (1451-81) When Mehmet resumed his reign, he was now influenced a Vizir, a Greek Christian, who encouraged him to conquered Constantinople. Now, using Western technology, Mehmet succeeded where so many Turks had failed in 1453. Mehmet allowed his troops free reign in the city for three days. The city was renamed Istanbul and repopulated with Greeks, Jews, Armenians. And grew in luster.Mehmets Conquests Continued Mehmet then seized Morea, southern Greece. Most of Albania. The Adriatic coast along modern day Croatia. And landed in the heel of Italy. His landings threatened Rome. What would have happened if Mehmet ruled longer?Problems for Bayezid II (1481-1512) Western princes held his brother and rival Jem prisoner and would unleash him if he attack the West. For instance the Island of Rhodes. Faced a spread of Shiism as a form of protest against the Ottomans. Bayezids son, Selim The Grim (1512-1520) transformed the Ottomans from a ghazi state into a great Empire.Selim The Grim (1512-20) Transformed the Ottoman Empire from a Ghazi State to a true empire. Expanded the state into Central Asia. Defeated the Mamluks and became the new masters in Egypt and Syria including the Hajaz and the Holy Places. All three Muslim Holy Places were controlled by the Ottomans Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem.Analysis of the Early Successes of the Ottomans The power and glory of the early Ottoman years is directly related to the abilities of the first ten Ottoman Sultans. Those men were able and intelligence. They gained from competing against their brothers. The loser was killed. The Sultans were not restrained by religious constraints.Ottoman Political Institutions The strength and efficiency came from the ruling class, aka, the Ottomans. A competing ruling group would emerge from the former rulers, often Christians in service to the Sultan and Turkish amirs in the Anatolia. As well as the Boy Levy called the Devshirme. The Christian youths entered either the Army or the State Bureaucracy.Joining the Ottoman Bureaucracy By standard practices any Ottoman subject could enter state service. But one must:Divisions within the Ruling Class Administrative Military Scribal CulturalThe Administrative Branch Was the Palace Included the Sultans wives and children and the servants. The cabinet, known as the Divan. The Divan was known as the Outer Service. The Servants was the Inner Service. The Chief Administrator was the Vizir. Were considered Second in Command to the Sultan. The early vizirs were Turks, but that changed. Soon it was filled by Christian converts.The Ottoman Military The Sipahis the Cavalry. Janissary Corps the Infantry. Discipline was strict and training was hard. The Sipahis would receive estates called Timars. The Janissaries were totally dependent on the Sultan for food and shelter.Raising Revenues and Administering Justice Collecting revenues was reserved to Tax Farmers who could keep some of the take. The tax farmers were called Multezim. But many officials were receiving bakhshish. Which is a bribe. The cultural branch was called the Ulama. Muslim scholars took over the administration of justice. They also ran the waqfs or Muslim endowments.The Signs of Decline The defeat of the Ottoman navy at Lepanto in 1571 was the first sign. The End of the Law of Fratricide provided substandard Sultans. Failure to modernize both the Army and Navy. After the failure of the second siege of Vienna in 1683, the Austrians forced the Turks to sign the Treaty of Karlowitz, which returned Hungary to Austria. Ultimately the failure to modernize contribute to the collapse of the Ottomans.
|